Theoretical Analysis of the Role of nuclear Energy in Achieving Sustainable Development and Environmental protection

Authors

  • Jawad Yaqubi Department of Energy Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Kabul University, Kabul, Afghanistan
  • Obaidullah Obaidi Department of Energy Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Kabul University, Kabul, Afghanistan
  • Abdul Matin Muqset Department of Civil Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Kabul University, Kabul, Afghanistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62810/jnsr.v4i1.423

Keywords:

Climate change mitigation, Lifecycle assessment , Nuclear energy, Sustainable development

Abstract

Nuclear energy provides reliable, low-carbon baseload power in the global clean energy transition. However, its sustainability remains contested due to radioactive waste management, safety risks, proliferation concerns, and high costs. This theoretical study critically analyzes nuclear energy within the sustainable development framework, assessing its alignment with economic, environmental, and social pillars while considering lifecycle impacts, resource longevity, governance requirements, and ethical implications. Using a qualitative method, the research synthesizes secondary data from IAEA reports, peer-reviewed assessments, and international legal documents. The analysis applies weak versus strong sustainability theory to evaluate resource substitutability and examines social dimensions including public acceptance, intergenerational justice, and historical accident analysis. Findings confirm minimal lifecycle emissions and low acidification potential, aligning with climate goals. Uranium resources are sufficient for over a century, with advanced fuel cycles potentially extending supply for millennia. However, significant challenges persist: long-term radioactive waste storage, safety risks, proliferation concerns, and high capital costs. The study concludes that nuclear energy supports sustainable development only under stringent conditions: robust legal frameworks, effective regulatory institutions, public trust, and innovation. This conditional outcome raises practical questions about nuclear viability in low-income countries lacking such institutional capacity. Therefore, nuclear energy should be evaluated within diversified portfolios, conditioned on rigorous governance, transparent engagement, and ethical responsibility toward future generations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brook, B. W., & Bradshaw, C. J. A. (2024). The role of nuclear fission in a sustainable energy future. Energy Policy, 185, 114321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.114321

Clayton, R., Kirk, J., Banford, A., & Stamford, L. (2024). A review of radioactive waste processing and disposal from a life cycle environmental perspective. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-024-02845-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-024-02998-6

Ecoinvent Centre. (2023). Ecoinvent database (Version 3.9). Zurich: Ecoinvent. https://ecoinvent.org

International Atomic Energy Agency. (2020). Initiating Nuclear Power Programmes: Responsibilities and Capabilities of Owners and Operators (NG-T-3.1 Rev.1). Vienna: IAEA. https://www.iaea.org/publications

International Atomic Energy Agency. (2023). Advances in Small Modular Reactor Technology Developments. Vienna: IAEA. https://www.iaea.org/publications

International Atomic Energy Agency. (2024a). Climate Change and Nuclear Power 2024: Financing Nuclear Energy in Low Carbon Transitions. Vienna: IAEA. https://www.iaea.org/publications/15754/climate-change-and-nuclear-power-2024

International Atomic Energy Agency. (2024b). Nuclear Technology Review 2024. Vienna: IAEA. https://www.iaea.org/publications

International Atomic Energy Agency. (2024c). IAEA Annual Report 2023. Vienna: IAEA. https://www.iaea.org/publications

International Atomic Energy Agency. (2024d). Milestones in the Development of a National Infrastructure for Nuclear Power (NG-G-3.1 Rev.3). Vienna: IAEA. https://www.iaea.org/publications

International Atomic Energy Agency. (2025). Nuclear Power Reactors in the World, 2025 Edition (Reference Data Series No. 2). Vienna: IAEA. https://www.iaea.org/publications/15943/nuclear-power-reactors-in-the-world

International Atomic Energy Agency & OECD Nuclear Energy Agency. (2024). Uranium 2024: Resources, Production and Demand (Red Book). OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd-nea.org/uranium-redbook

International Energy Agency. (2024). World Energy Outlook 2024. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2024

International Energy Agency. (2025). Electricity 2025: Analysis and forecast to 2026. Paris: IEA. https://www.iea.org/reports/electricity-2025

IPCC. (2023). Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Geneva: IPCC. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/

Jenkins, K., Sovacool, B. K., Mouter, N., Hielscher, S., & McCauley, D. (2023). Energy justice and nuclear power: A critical review. Energy Research & Social Science, 98, 103012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.103012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.103012

Kim, Y., Kim, M., & Kim, W. (2023). Public perception of nuclear energy post-Fukushima: A ten-year review. Energy Research & Social Science, 95, 102901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102901 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102901

Neumayer, E. (2003). Weak versus strong sustainability: Exploring the limits of two opposing paradigms (4th ed.). Edward Elgar Publishing.

OECD Nuclear Energy Agency. (2024). Decommissioning Funding: International Status and Trends. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd-nea.org/decommissioning

Prăvălie, R., & Bandoc, G. (2024). Nuclear energy and climate change: A comprehensive review of global trends, challenges, and opportunities. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 189, 113987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113987

Schneider, M., & Froggatt, A. (2023). The World Nuclear Industry Status Report 2023. Paris: Mycle Schneider Consulting. https://www.worldnuclearreport.org

Stamford, L., & Azapagic, A. (2014). Life cycle sustainability assessment of electricity options for the UK. International Journal of Energy Research, 38(1), 126–139. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.3103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/er.3103

Taebi, B., & Kloosterman, J. L. (2024). Intergenerational justice and nuclear waste management: Ethical dimensions. Journal of Risk Research, 27(2), 145-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2024.2317321

Tanaka, S., & Ito, Y. (2024). Fukushima's legacy: Public attitudes toward nuclear energy in Japan a decade later. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 93, 102215.

United Nations. (2023). The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2023. New York: United Nations. https://sdgs.un.org/reports

United Nations. (2024). The Pact for the Future & Declaration on Future Generations (A/RES/79/1). New York: United Nations. https://www.un.org/en/summit-of-the-future

World Resources Institute. (2023). Sources of eutrophication: Global assessment 2023. Washington, DC: WRI. https://www.wri.org/our-work/project/eutrophic

Yamashita, T., Tanaka, S., & Ito, Y. (2022). Mental health impacts of the Fukushima disaster: A longitudinal study. Social Science & Medicine, 305, 115089. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115089

Downloads

Published

2026-03-31

How to Cite

Yaqubi, J., Obaidi, O., & Muqset, A. M. (2026). Theoretical Analysis of the Role of nuclear Energy in Achieving Sustainable Development and Environmental protection. Journal of Natural Science Review, 4(1), 246–270. https://doi.org/10.62810/jnsr.v4i1.423

Issue

Section

Articles