Biotic Resistance, Quality, and Storage Behavior of Potato (Solanum Tuberosum L.) as Influenced by Bio-Stimulants

Authors

  • Mohammad Nasim Ayobi Kabul University, Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Kabul Afghanistan
  • A. P. Mallikarjuna Gowda University of Agricultural Sciences, Zonal Agricultural Research Station, G. K. V. K, Bengaluru-560065, India
  • Manjunath B University of Agricultural Sciences, Zonal Agricultural Research Station, G.K.V.K, Bengaluru, Karnataka-560065, India
  • Rahmat Gul Hassanzai Kabul University, Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Kabul Afghanistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62810/jnsr.v4i2.358

Keywords:

Potato, Bio-stimulants, Biotic resistance, Quality, Storage behavior

Abstract

The study was conducted at Zonal Agricultural Research Station, University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bangalore, to assess the impact of various bio-stimulants on the biotic resistance, quality, and storage behavior of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) during the Ll, 2022-23, and R, 2023. The experiment was designed as a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with nine treatments and three replications, using bio-stimulants such as humic acid, amino acids, seaweed extracts, and microbial consortia. The treatment combination of whole tubers + RDF + Humic acid at 2 mL L-1 significantly enhanced plant resistance against pests and diseases. This treatment led to the lowest aphid and cutworm populations, reduced tuber moth infestation, and minimized the incidence of early blight, late blight, and bacterial wilt compared to the control—further, the same treatment combination improved tuber quality, viz., TSS and starch content. Additionally, it resulted in lower percentage of physiological loss of weight (PLW) and sprouting during storage under room temperature, with minimal tuber rot. In contrast, the control treatment recorded the highest pest populations, disease incidence and post-harvest losses. These findings suggest that the treatment comprising whole tubers, RDF, and Humic acid at 2 ml L-1 effectively improves biotic resistance, quality, and storage behavior of potatoes under ambient conditions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abd El-Latif, K. M., El-Aidy, F., & Mahmoud, A. W. M. (2024). Effect of amino acid-based biostimulants on growth, yield, and tuber quality of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) under field conditions. Horticulturae, 10(3), 212. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10030212

Alenazi, M., Wahb-Allah, M. A., Abdel-Razzak, H. S., Ibrahim, A. A., & Alsadon, A. (2016). Water regimes and humic acid application influences potato growth, yield, tuber quality and water use efficiency. American Journal of Potato Research, 93, 463–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12230-016-9523-7

Alkharpotly, A., Roshdy, A., & Mady, E. (2018). Potato growth and yield attributes as affected by boron and selenium foliar application. Journal of Plant Production, 9(11), 901–911. https://doi.org/10.21608/JPP.2018.36600

Badawy, M. E. I., & Rabea, E. I. (2011). A biopolymer chitosan and its derivatives as promising antimicrobial agents against plant pathogens and their applications in crop protection. International Journal of Carbohydrate Chemistry, 2011, 460381. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/460381

Badawy, S. M., & Rabea, M. A. (2011). Extension of shelf life of potato tubers by application of natural sprout suppressants. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 62(1), 54–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2011.04.006

Canellas, L. P., Olivares, F. L., Aguiar, N. O., Jones, D. L., Nebbioso, A., Mazzei, P., & Piccolo, A. (2015). Humic and fulvic acids as biostimulants in horticulture. Scientia Horticulturae, 196, 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.013

Cappelletti, M., Perazzolli, M., Nesler, A., Giovannini, O., & Pertot, I. (2017). The effect of hydrolysis and protein source on the efficacy of protein hydrolysates as plant resistance inducers against powdery mildew. Journal of Bioprocessing & Biotechniques, 7(5), 1000306. https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9821.1000306

Chaerani, R., Groenwold, R., Stam, P., & Voorrips, R. E. (2007). Assessment of early blight (Alternaria solani) resistance in tomato using a droplet inoculation method. Journal of General Plant Pathology, 73, 96–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10327-006-0337-1

Choudhary, D. K., Johri, B. N., & Prakash, A. (2007). Induced systemic resistance (ISR) in plants: Mechanism of action. Indian Journal of Microbiology, 47, 289–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-007-0054-2

Das, S., Mitra, B., Saha, A., Mandal, S., Paul, P. K., El-Sharnouby, M., Hassan, M. M., Maitra, S., & Hossain, A. (2021). Evaluation of quality parameters of seven processing-type potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) cultivars in the Eastern Sub-Himalayan plains. Foods, 10(5), 1138. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10051138

Du Jardin, P. (2015). Plant biostimulants: Definition, concept, main categories and regulation. Scientia Horticulturae, 196, 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.021

El-Banna, A. E., Abd El-Razek, A. M., & El-Badry, O. Z. (2006). Influence of nitrogen levels and potassium sources on growth, yield and quality of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Mansoura University, 31(10), 6549–6561.

Ezekiel, R., Rani, M., & Kumar, D. (2007). Chipping quality of potatoes stored at 8–20 °C under controlled conditions. Potato Journal, 34(3–4), 174–179. https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/PotatoJ/article/view/32908

Ezekiel, R., Singh, N., Sharma, S., & Kaur, A. (2013). Beneficial phytochemicals in potato—A review. Food Research International, 50(2), 487–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2011.04.025

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2008). International Year of the Potato 2008: New light on a hidden treasure. Rome, Italy: FAO. https://www.fao.org/4/i0500e/i0500e.pdf

Farouk, S., Mosa, A. A., Taha, A. A., & El-Gahmery, A. M. (2011). Protective effect of humic acid and chitosan on radish (Raphanus sativus L. var. sativus) plants subjected to cadmium stress. Journal of Stress Physiology & Biochemistry, 7(2), 99–116. https://www.jspb.ru/issues/2011/N2/JSPB_2011_2_99-116.html

Jayaraj, J., Wan, A., Rahman, M., & Punja, Z. K. (2008). Seaweed extract reduces foliar fungal diseases on carrot. Crop Protection, 27(10), 1360–1366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2008.05.005

Khan, M. R., Fischer, S., Egan, D., & Doohan, F. M. (2004). Biological control of Fusarium seedling blight disease of wheat and barley. Phytopathology, 94(12), 1342–1348. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO.2004.94.12.1342

Khan, M. S., Zaidi, A., & Wani, P. A. (2004). Role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as biocontrol agents of plant diseases: A review. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 63, 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-003-1440-1

Kołodziejczyk, M., & Gwóźdź, K. (2022). Effect of plant growth regulators on potato tuber yield and quality. Plant, Soil and Environment, 68(8), 375–381. https://doi.org/10.17221/215/2022-PSE

Larkin, R. P. (2008). Relative effects of biological amendments and crop rotations on soil microbial communities and soilborne diseases of potato. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 40(6), 1341–1351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.12.016

Li, J., Van Gerrewey, T., & Geelen, D. (2022). A meta-analysis of biostimulant yield effectiveness in field trials. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 836702. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.836702

Mulugeta, T., Mulatu, B., Tekie, H., Yesuf, M., Andreasson, E., & Alexandersson, E. (2019). Phosphite alters the behavioral response of potato tuber moth (Phthorimaea operculella) to field-grown potato. Pest Management Science, 75(3), 616–621. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.5182

Patterson, M., & Alyokhin, A. (2014). Survival and development of Colorado potato beetles on potatoes treated with phosphite. Crop Protection, 61, 38–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2014.03.014

Ren, J., Tong, J., Li, P., Huang, X., Dong, P., & Ren, M. (2021). Chitosan is an effective inhibitor against potato dry rot caused by Fusarium oxysporum. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 113, 101601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmpp.2020.101601

Rose, M. T., Patti, A. F., Little, K. R., Brown, A. L., Jackson, W. R., & Cavagnaro, T. R. (2014). A meta-analysis and review of plant-growth response to humic substances: Practical implications for agriculture. Advances in Agronomy, 124, 37–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800138-7.00002-4

Rose, M. T., Patti, A. F., Little, K. R., Brown, A. L., Jackson, W. R., & Cavagnaro, T. R. (2014). A meta-analysis and review of plant-growth response to humic substances: Practical implications for agriculture. Advances in Agronomy, 124, 37–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800138-7.00002-4

Rouphael, Y., & Colla, G. (2020). Editorial: Biostimulants in horticulture. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 4, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.00004

Rouphael, Y., & Colla, G. (2020). Biostimulants in agriculture. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11, 40. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00040

Rouphael, Y., Cardarelli, M., Di Mattia, E., Tullio, M., Rea, E., & Colla, G. (2010). Enhancement of alkalinity tolerance in two cucumber genotypes inoculated with an arbuscular mycorrhizal biofertilizer containing Glomus intraradices. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 46, 499–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-010-0442-5

Rouphael, Y., Colla, G., Giordano, M., El-Nakhel, C., Kyriacou, M. C., & De Pascale, S. (2017). Foliar applications of a legume-derived protein hydrolysate elicit dose-dependent increases in growth, leaf mineral composition, yield, and fruit quality in two greenhouse tomato cultivars. Scientia Horticulturae, 226, 353–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2017.09.011

Salvage, R., Cannon, T., Kingsmill, P., Liu, F., & Fleming, C. C. (2024). A complex biostimulant based on plant flavonoids enhances potato growth and commercial yields. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 8, 1368423. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2024.1368423

Selim, E. M., El-Neklawy, A. S., & El-Ashry, S. M. (2010). Beneficial effects of humic substances on soil fertility to fertigated potato grown on sandy soil. Libyan Agriculture Research Center Journal International, 1(4), 255–262. https://www.cabi.org/isc/FullTextPDF/2010/20103203479.pdf

Sharaby, A. M. F., & Fallatah, S. B. (2019). Protection of stored potatoes from infestation with the potato tuber moth (Phthorimaea operculella (Zeller) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae)) using plant powders. Bulletin of the National Research Centre, 43, 79. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-019-0119-5

Wadas, W., & Dziugiel, T. (2020). Changes in assimilation area and chlorophyll content of very early potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) cultivars as influenced by biostimulants. Agronomy, 10(3), 387. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10030387

Wadas, W., & Dziugieł, T. (2020). Quality of new potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.) in response to biostimulant application. Agriculture, 10(7), 265. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10070265

Zhang, N., Wang, D., Liu, Y., Li, S., Shen, Q., & Zhang, R. (2013). Effects of different plant growth–promoting rhizobacteria on growth, nutrient uptake, and disease resistance of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Applied Soil Ecology, 72: 113-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2013.06.002

Zhang, S., Reddy, M. S., Kloepper, J. W., & Ryu, C. M. (2007). Rhizobacteria-mediated growth promotion and induced systemic resistance in cucumber and tomato: The role of indole-3-acetic acid, cytokinins, and gibberellins. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 53(4), 509–517. https://doi.org/10.1139/w07-008

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

Issue

Section

Agricultural Sciences & Crop Production

How to Cite

Biotic Resistance, Quality, and Storage Behavior of Potato (Solanum Tuberosum L.) as Influenced by Bio-Stimulants. (2026). Journal of Natural Science Review , 4(2), 435-449. https://doi.org/10.62810/jnsr.v4i2.358