Evaluating the Yield Performance of Eight Cotton Improved Varieties with Two Local in the Agro-Ecological Zone Western, Kandahar

Authors

  • Noor Mohammad Ahmadi Agricultural Faculty Department of Agronomy, Wardak Institute of Higher Education, Afghanistan
  • Emal Nasari Agricultural Faculty Department of Horticulture, Wardak Institute of Higher Education, Afghanistan
  • Abdullah Aram Agricultural Faculty Department of Agronomy, Wardak Institute of Higher Education, Afghanistan
  • Hekamatullah Hikmat Agricultural Faculty Department of Horticulture, Wardak Institute of Higher Education, Afghanistan
  • Abdul Basir Torabi Agricultural Faculty Department of Agronomy, Wardak Institute of Higher Education, Afghanistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62810/jnsr.v2iSpecial.Issue.113

Keywords:

Adaptation Agro-ecological, Cotton, Evaluation, Varieties, Yield

Abstract

Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) is a crucial crop that produces fluffy fiber essential for the global textile industry. Cottonseed is also a valuable raw material for oil and feed industries due to its high protein content. This study compared nine varieties (Namken, Agosta, N726, Turkish, CD-401, Acala 151799, Blanka, Paloma, and Acala 1517-75) with two local standard cultivars (F-108 and Acala) to identify highly adaptable and sustainable varieties for regional and global markets based on yield performance. The trial was conducted in 2018 at the Kokaron research farm in Kandahar, a semi-arid region. The experiment was established by ARIA using a randomized complete block design with four replications, with each plot measuring 12 m². Results revealed that Agosta produced the highest cottonseed yield, followed by Namken. Furthermore, Agosta achieved the highest total yield, with Namken, Blanka, Paloma, and N726 following in descending order among all tested varieties. Fiber length varied significantly among all varieties under investigation. In conclusion, eight varieties (Agosta, Namken, Blanka, Paloma, N726, Turkish, Acala 151799, and CD-401) demonstrated higher economic production compared to the regional standard varieties, with Agosta emerging as the most promising variety for the research area.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arshad, M., Afzal, M., Khan, M. I., & Mahmood, R. (2003). Performances of newly developed cotton strains for economic and fiber traits in national coordinated varietal trials. Pakistan Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, 46(5), 373-375.

Ashokkumar, K., & Ravikesavan, R. (2011). Morphological diversity and per se performance in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Journal of Agricultural Science, 3(2), 107-113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v3n2p107

Ballester, C., Hornbuckle, J., Brinkhoff, J., & Quayle, W. C. (2012). Effects of three irrigation frequencies and nitrogen rates on lint yield, nitrogen use efficiency, and cotton fiber quality under furrow irrigation. Agricultural Water Management, 248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106783

Basbag, S., & Temiz, M. G. (2004). Determinations of some agronomical and technological properties of cotton having different colored fiber. Journal of Agronomy, 3(4), 301-304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/ja.2004.301.304

Bechere, E., Boykin, J. C., & Meredith, W. R. (2011). Evaluation of cotton genotypes for ginning energy and ginning rate. Journal of Cotton Science, 15, 11-21.

Begum, S., & Hossain, M. S. (2011). Characterization and evaluation of advanced cotton genotypes in Bangladesh. SAARC Journal of Agriculture, 9(1), 1-12.

Begum, S., Kashem, M. A., Miah, M. A. E., Ali, M. M. A., Hossain, S., & Akter, N. (2005). Multilocation yield trial of American cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). SAARC Journal of Agriculture, 3, 29-36.

Copur, O. (2006). Determination of yield and yield components of some cotton cultivars in semi-arid conditions. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 9(14), 2572-2578. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2006.2572.2578

Efe, L., Killi, F., & Mustafayev, S. A. (2013). An evaluation of some mutant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) varieties from Azerbaijan in Southeast Anatolian region of Turkey. African Journal of Biotechnology, 12(33), 5117-5130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB11.1785

Ehsan, F., Ali, A., Nadeem, M. A., Tahir, M., & Majeed, A. (2008). Comparative yield performance of new cultivars of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences, 6(1), 1-3.

Hanif, C. M., Hassan, S. W., Mehdi, S. S., Iqbal, K., & Hayat, F. (2005). Performance of candidate cotton genotypes in respect of yield and yield components. Indus Cotton, 2(2), 151-154.

Hussain, M., Ahmad, A., & Zamir, S. I. (2007). Evaluation of agro-qualitative characters of five cotton varieties. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 26(8), 4912-4918.

Karademir, E., Karademir, C., Ekinci, R., & Gencer, O. (2010). Relationship between yield, fiber length, and other fiber-related traits in advanced cotton strains. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 38(3), 111-116.

Khan, A. A., Sajid, M. A., Iqbal, Z. H., Khan, B., Islam, F., Ali, K., & Ahmed, A. (2017). Improving yield and mineral profile of tomato through changing crop microenvironment. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 26(8), 4911-4918.

Khan, N., Marwat, K. B., Hassan, G., Ullah, F., Batool, S., Makhdoom, K., Ahmad, W., & Khan, H. U. (2005). Genetic variations and heritability for cotton seed, fiber, and oil traits in Gossypium hirsutum L. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 42(1), 615-625.

Kumar, S., Singh, V., Tuteja, O., Monga, D., & Meena, R. (2000). Range of variability for economic characters in cotton germplasm (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Indian Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 13, 234-238.

Paudel, D. R., Hequet, E. F., & Abidi, N. (2013). Evaluation of cotton fiber maturity. Production Journal, 45, 435-441. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.12.041

Razzaq, A., Zafar, M. M., Arfan, A., Hafeez, A., Batool, W., Yuzhen, S., Wankui, G., & Youlu, Y. (2012). Cotton germplasm improvement and progress in Pakistan. Journal of Cotton Research, 4, 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42397-020-00077-x

Salman, M., Masood, A., Arif, M. J., Saeed, S., & Hameed, M. (2011). The resistance levels of different cotton varieties against sucking insect pests complex in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Agriculture, Agricultural Engineering and Veterinary Sciences, 27(2), 168-175.

Saranga, Y., Menz, M., Jiang, C. X., Robert, J. W., Yakir, D., & Paterson, A. H. (2001). Genomic dissection of genotype × environment interactions conferring adaptation of cotton to arid conditions. Genome Research, 11, 1988-1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.157201

Shah, M. A., & Rasheed, S. M. (2016). Evaluation of different cotton varieties for yield performance collected from public sector. International Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Research, 5(4), 227-233.

Sharma, A., Deepa, R., Sankar, S., Pryor, M., Stewart, B., Johnson, E., & Anandhi, A. (2021). Use of growing degree indicator for developing adaptive responses: A case study of cotton in Florida. Ecological Indicators, 124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107383

Singh, S. P., Paramjit, S., Buttar, G. S., & Bains, G. S. (2008). Evaluation of cotton genotypes for their performance during spring summer season. Journal of Agro-meteorology, 10(1), 82-85.

Soomro, A. R., Kakar, R. G., Hakoomat, A., & Abid, S. A. (2005). Comparison of yield and its components in some commercial cotton varieties. Indus Journal of Plant Sciences, 4(4), 545-552.

Zamir, D. (2001). Improving plant breeding with exotic genetic libraries. Nature Reviews Genetics, 2, 983-989. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35103589

Downloads

Published

2024-11-23

How to Cite

Ahmadi, N. M., Nasari, E., Aram, A., Hikmat, H., & Torabi, A. B. (2024). Evaluating the Yield Performance of Eight Cotton Improved Varieties with Two Local in the Agro-Ecological Zone Western, Kandahar. Journal of Natural Science Review, 2(Special.Issue), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.62810/jnsr.v2iSpecial.Issue.113